Who Gets Hurt In the Crackdown on Pain Meds?


100 million people are suffering from chronic pain in the United States, according to the Institute of Medicine. Policies are being and have been put into place to tackle drug addiction at the cost of the quality of life of chronic pain patients. It is immoral and criminal to take away the rights of good people because of the actions of bad people. In 2011, the CDC declared a prescription drug epidemic. A 2014 report by the National Institute on Drug Abuse estimated that 2.1 million people in the United States abused prescription opioid painkillers in 2012. 2.1 million is a drop in the bucket compared to 100 million chronic pain sufferers.

The DEA’s answer to that is let’s make it difficult on doctors, pharmacies and 100 million chronic pain sufferers because 2.1 million people can not control their actions so it is up to us to hurt 100 million to control the actions of the 2.1 million. Managing chronic pain is a separate issue from treating people suffering from addiction. “Addiction is a completely different disease”. Alcohol prohibition only increased addiction and crime. The war on drugs has only increased addiction and crime. Laws and regulations have never helped or cured any addiction it only serves to increase both. They can make a law saying it is against the law to be in pain, but it will not stop or cure pain, it will only make criminals out of those who happen to be in pain. This has more to do with job security for the DEA and revenue for the industrial prison complex than anything else.

Doctors nor the government officials feel or live with your pain. Your pain does not affect their life. You are the one who has to live with it and your family are the ones who have to suffer as well watching a love one struggle through their life in pain. Many people and their families have to deal with this day in day out month in month out year in year out. It eventually leads to depression and even death or suicide. People should not have to live like that because the government or some doctor is scared of drug abuse! People should not have to live in pain because other people may abuse drugs.

Many people today have to either live in pain or buy their drugs on the blackmarket. How does that stop drug abuse? This only increases crime as those in pain often have no other way to obtain the medicine they need to alleviate their pain. It increase crime not decreases crime and forces people already struggling to become criminals to help or alleviate their pain. This takes away their right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That makes government officials who make and enforce drug laws criminals as it violates their oath of office. It also creates more government corruption. The laws in place today do nothing but leave millions of people to suffer and live out a life of pain, suffering and depression.

Before the state existed, and even long after it existed, people could grow cannabis or opium or any herb or anything else they wanted for medicine or any other purposes. As it stands now you are FORCED to go through the healthcare system and many times turned down for the medications you need period. This can cost thousands of dollars over time to get what you could get for free by growing your own medicines. This also cause the people a lot of pain and suffering and many times even death. This infringes on the right of the people. This is not a matter of federal rights or state rights it is the peoples rights and state nor federal government has any say so in it lawfully.

Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491. “

…statutes which would deprive a citizen of the rights of person or property without a regular trial, according to the course and usage of common law, would not be the law of the land.” Hoke v. Henderson,15 N.C.15, 25 AM Dec. 677.

“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. United States Supreme Court reminds us in Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906):

“Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of limitations upon his authority.” The United States Supreme Court, Federal Crop Ins. Corp, v. Merrill, 332 US 380-388 L1947)

Any court, government or government officer who acts in violation of, in opposition or contradiction to the Constitution, by his, or her, own actions, commits treason and invokes the self-executing Sections 3 and 4 of the 14th Amendment and vacates his, or her, office.

” An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government”. Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp.94.

AM14.3/HO, IR No person shall hold office if he rebels against or violates the U.S. Constitution (treason).

Cooper v. Aaron, By Chief Justice Earl Warren
No state, legislator, executive or judicial officer can “War” against (or test the limitations of) the Constitution without violating their undertaking to support it (Breach of Oath/Contract, Treason??). The Constitution created a government dedicated to equal justice under law. The Fourteenth Amendment embodied and emphasized that ideal…no State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Our constitutional ideal of equal justice under law is thus made a living truth. (Book, Our Nation’s Archive © 1999 pg 701)

The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28].

Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.

5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”

“[p]owers not granted (to any government) are prohibited.” United States v. Butler, 297 U.S 1, 68 (1936).

Common Law is the law of the land; any statute in conflict with the Constitution is unenforceable; and, to enforce such statute is a crime. It is the duty of the Sheriff and U.S. Marshal, being Constitutional Officers, to make sure judges, officers of the court and all elected, appointed and hired servants obey the law; and, when they violate the law under the color of law, it is the ‘DUTY’ of the Sheriff & U.S. Marshal to arrest such public servant immediately.

Judges, Presidents or agencies do not have any constitutional authority to make law period. Congress is the only one who have authority to make laws and powers delegated to them can not be delegated to ANYONE else! Even then congress MUST stay within their authority, the constitution and the law. Any law made any other way does not have due process of law! All you have to do is look at any government officials voting record and it is easy to see ALL of them have violated their oath of office to support, uphold and defend the constitution. All judges and police have violated their oath of office by enforcing unconstitutional laws. No one in government today lawfully represents the government or is allowed to hold office they are in or any other office as a government official. They are all con men impersonating government officials by law.

DEA Inflicts Harm on Chronic Pain Patients

What Will People in Severe Pain Do Now?

How Will People in Severe Pain Cope Without Narcotics?

Pain Patients Say They Can’t Get Medicine After Crackdown On Illegal Rx Drug Trade

Pain Experts Predict Problems with Hydrocodone Rescheduling

Who Gets Hurt In the Crackdown on Pain Meds?
Feds’ Pill Crackdown Drives Pain Patients to Heroin


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s