Hillary does not qualify to run for or hold a office by law. In fact no one in office today qualifies. The corruption has gone so far that none of them are even lawfully representing the government anymore meaning they are impostors because they claim they do represent the government when the supreme law of the land say they do not. Any thing they do is null and void. At this time the people can only govern themselves or they can arrest and seize the assets of all official and replace them with people who will obey the law and do the same to them if they cross the line. to do that the people need to educate themselves and their children as to where that line lays and when to act on it. The law clearly states where that line lays for ALL government official including judges, police officers, any agency official, congressmen, senators, presidents, ALL of them.
The problem is and is not who is voted in but more about who is not being held accountable for their crimes. If those in power are not charged and arrested for their crimes no matter how small it then leads to corruption on a epic scale as we now have. Now we are dealing with decades of laws that have gone unchecked, they are unconstitutional and null and void but enforced anyway. Even the would be lawful laws have no lawful signature on them because the law dictates that when you step outside your constitutional authority you no longer represent the government and even if you claim you do you have no lawful standing. Anything they do is null and void.
“Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of limitations upon his authority.” The United States Supreme Court, Federal Crop Ins. Corp, v. Merrill, 332 US 380-388 L1947)
“The United States is entirely a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source. It can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution.” Reid v Covert 354 US l, 1957.
Cooper v. Aaron, By Chief Justice Earl Warren
No state, legislator, executive or judicial officer can “War” against (or test the limitations of) the Constitution without violating their undertaking to support it (Breach of Oath/Contract, Treason??). The Constitution created a government dedicated to equal justice under law. The Fourteenth Amendment embodied and emphasized that ideal…no State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Our constitutional ideal of equal justice under law is thus made a living truth. (Book, Our Nation’s Archive © 1999 pg 701)
AM14.3/HO, IR No person shall hold office if he rebels against or violates the U.S. Constitution (treason).
AM14.3/RD Congress shall impeach anyone who rebels against or violates the U.S. Constitution.
” An officer who acts in violation of the constitution ceases to represent the government”. Brookfield Const. Co. v. Stewart, 284 F. Supp.94.
“State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities.” Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991).
The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”
Hillary Clinton’s cloud of corruption
Impostors! Our Shadow Government.
Posted on July 21, 2016 by slydog1960