The Gun And The Law

The Constitution of the united States of America

Bill of Rights Amendment II.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The Constitution of the united States of America, Article VI, Cl 2, 3. “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof;… shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby… The Senators and Representatives and members of the State legislature, and all executive and judicial officers of the United States and the several States, shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”

Any laws created by government which are repugnant to the Constitution carry NO force of law and are VOID:

“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment… In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed… Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it… A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution JTM) it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N.W. 885, 136 Wis. 193 (1908); NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425 (1886). See also Bonnett v Vallier, 136 Wis 193, 200; 116 NW 885, 887 (1908); State ex rel Ballard v Goodland, 159 Wis 393, 395; 150 NW 488, 489 (1915); State ex rel Kleist v Donald, 164 Wis 545, 552-553; 160 NW 1067, 1070 (1917); State ex rel Martin v Zimmerman, 233 Wis 16, 21; 288 NW 454, 457 (1939); State ex rel Commissioners of Public Lands v Anderson, 56 Wis 2d 666, 672; 203 NW2d 84, 87 (1973); and Butzlaffer v Van Der Geest & Sons, Inc, Wis, 115 Wis 2d 539; 340 NW2d 742, 744-745 (1983).

~ In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court itself declared that “an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void.” ~

~ No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” — 16 American Jurisprudence, 2nd edition, Sec. 177; late 2nd edition, Sec. 256; ~

“Insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (constitution) it is superseded thereby.” (16 Am Jur 2d 177, Late Am Jur 2d. 256)

Since they take a oath of office they only have authority to uphold and support the constitution. This oath of office is a federal crime to violate. Punishment calls for immediate dismissal and federal crimes of treason and fraud as well as others.

“The United States is entirely a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source. It can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution.” Reid v Covert 354 US l, 1957.

SUPPORT, v. Furnishing funds or means for maintenance; to maintain; to provide for; to
enable to continue; to carry on. State v. Hinkle, 161 Wash. 652, 297 P. 1071, 1075.

Boyd v. U S, 116 US 616 5th Amendment rights. “…constitutional provisions for the security of person and property should be liberally construed… It is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of Citizens, and against any stealthy encroachment thereon.”

Hurtado v. United States, 410 US 578 (1973) “It is not every act, legislative in form, that is law. Law is something more than mere will exerted as an act of power…Arbitrary power, enforcing its edicts to the injury of the party and property of its subjects is not law.”

When laws are passed that infringe on ANY of your rights they are unconstitutional and unlawful, null and void and, congress knows it, the president knows it, police know it and the judges know it. It is the judges DUTY to rule them so. It is treason when they do not. To allow a law to stay on the books or to have ever even voted for that law or was involved in getting any unconstitutional law passed or enforced is a violation of oath of office plain and simple. The second you violate your oath of office you become nothing more than a common criminal a thug. No matter if your dressed in a suit a uniform with a gun or street clothes your still a criminal and a thug and you and I both know it.

To make ANY rules and regulations against arms is a violation of oath of office. To enforce or even try to enforce ANY such rules or legislation is a violation of oath of office.

Owens v. City of Independence,445 US 622, 100 S. Ct. 1398 Maine v. Thiboutot,448 US 1, 100 S. Ct. 2502 Hafer v. Melo, 502 US 21 Officers of the Court have no immunity, when violating a constitutional right, from liability, for they are deemed to know the law.

To disregard Constitutional law, and to violate the same, creates a sure liability upon the one involved:

“State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities.” Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991).

“Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of limitations upon his authority.” The United States Supreme Court, Federal Crop Ins. Corp, v. Merrill, 332 US 380-388 L1947)

~ The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government” ~

Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co.,111 US 746 (1884).” Our rights cannot, by acts of Congress, be bartered away, given away or taken away.”

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” – Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.

Black’s law dictionary 4th edtion
ABROGATE. To annul, repeal, or destroy; to annul or repeal an order or rule issued by a subordinate authority; to repeal a former law by legislative act, or by usage.

Murdock v. Pennsylvania 319 US 105 No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it. “A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by Federal constitution. at 113, (1943).

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights.”- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

Butchers’ Union Co. v. Crescent City Co.,111 US 746 (1884).” Our rights cannot, by acts of Congress, be bartered away, given away or taken away.”

“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. United States Supreme Court reminds us in Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906):

Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, 373 US 262 If a state converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.

Byars v. U.S. , 273 US 28 Unlawful search and seizure. Rights must be interpreted in favor of the citizen.

Laws existed long before government did Here in America the government officials have to go by the law as well they can not just make up laws saying them or anyone else is exempt from laws made long before they existed. What could you do and what did our forefathers do before state and federal governments were established? You have a right to do everything you could do then and no rules or legislation can be made against those rights.

Well they could buy land and do anything they wanted on their land, they could build houses, no licenses or permits, no one telling them what they could build or how it had to be built, and no taxes, no one to kick you out and steal it from you.

They could grow gardens as well as herb and medicinal gardens, no regulations, no charges, no imprisonment.

They could travel no license no tags no charges no passports and no imprisonment, No one stopping them to search their belongings ( they would have been shot if they tried ), and no one asking them where you been and where are you going. No tickets no fines.

They could own and shoot guns again no charges no imprisonment. In fact ANY type of arms you wanted or could build you could have.

They could hunt, they could trap and they could fish, no charges no imprisonment.

They could carry on a business as they saw fit with out government interference and regulations and taxation.

They could raise and educate their kids as they saw fit. No rules no regulations no taxes no fees not one telling them they could not teach them this or that.

They could have meetings without being spied on or anyone telling them what they could or could not say or discuss. In fact as long as they did not hurt anyone or their property their power of what they could do or say was almost limitless.

The government by treason and fraud and unlawful enforcement have built up a way to charge you for all these and many other rights in violation of their oath of office. They are by actions the very definition of fraud, treason, racketeering, organized crime and terrorist. Did you consent to that?

~ It poisons the blessings of liberty itself. It will be of little avail to the people, that laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they can not be read, or so incoherent they can not be understood. Federalist Number 62 ~

We have over 80 millions laws most unconstitutional and most geared toward lining the pockets of politicians, people in high places in government, corporations, banks and the prison industrial complex, the industrial war complex, the industrial education complex, the industrial government complex and the industrial health system complex. They generate billions if not trillions every year in fines and billions more in taxes to enforce them all. They bring in money for themselves from every side and angle. They make more and more laws for us everyday while exempting themselves from the very same laws they write for us. For over 600 years to commit a crime in England or the United States in its beginnings you had to harm someone or their property. Today they make anything they choose a crime, and make and apply law unconstitutionally in violation of oath of office, the constitution, and in spite of peoples rights, all for money and control. This is nothing less than organized crime and tyranny. This is far from the consent of the governed.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s