A Nation Of Law And Not Of Men

A Nation Of Law And Not Of Men

The power to make or change law is ONLY in the hands of congress controlled by the people by law laid down long before government ever existed.

This is a contract. Created by the people. They created it, it is their property, they can do as they will with it. We chose to create a corporation to serve us. To serve the people not to rule the people. So we formed a corporation. That is what the contract of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is. That is it’s name. We own it they work for use to achieve certain goals of the people. Like any corporation this one has laws and rules they have to live by because they are employees. What ever laws they make they have to go by the company rules and they can not make any laws that apply outside that corporation any more than can any other corporations. If you do not work for McDonald’s Their company rules and regulations do not apply to you. That is the law of man who has every right he was created with. Their law do not apply to you, you do not work for them. So here is what the law and contract says about who rules who. Who gets to rule? Well first off we the people because we own it. And congress we give the right to make rules and laws for the corporation and its workers.

The Constitution Of The United States Of America
Article. I.
SECTION. 1.
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

No one else in the government has any constitutional authority to make or change any laws. Not the judicial branch, not the executive branch, not ANY agency and certainly not any corporation or foreign nation through treaties.

Even in that congress has limitations to what laws they can allow.

“The United States is entirely a creature of the Constitution. Its power and authority have no other source. It can only act in accordance with all the limitations imposed by the Constitution.” Reid v Covert 354 US l, 1957.

Any laws created by government which are repugnant to the Constitution carry NO force of law and are VOID:

“The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment… In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed… Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it… A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution ) it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” Bonnett v. Vallier, 116 N.W. 885, 136 Wis. 193 (1908); NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425 (1886). See also Bonnett v Vallier, 136 Wis 193, 200; 116 NW 885, 887 (1908); State ex rel Ballard v Goodland, 159 Wis 393, 395; 150 NW 488, 489 (1915); State ex rel Kleist v Donald, 164 Wis 545, 552-553; 160 NW 1067, 1070 (1917); State ex rel Martin v Zimmerman, 233 Wis 16, 21; 288 NW 454, 457 (1939); State ex rel Commissioners of Public Lands v Anderson, 56 Wis 2d 666, 672; 203 NW2d 84, 87 (1973); and Butzlaffer v Van Der Geest & Sons, Inc, Wis, 115 Wis 2d 539; 340 NW2d 742, 744-745 (1983).

“Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void;” and the courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” Marbury v Madison, 5 US 1803 (2 Cranch) 137, 170?180, and NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425.

“When an act of the legislature is repugnant or contrary to the constitution, it is, ipso facto, void.” 2 Pet. R. 522; 12 Wheat. 270; 3 Dall. 286; 4 Dall. 18.

“[p]owers not granted (to any government) are prohibited.” United States v. Butler, 297 U.S 1, 68 (1936).

“Insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (constitution) it is superseded thereby.” (16 Am Jur 2d 177, Late Am Jur 2d. 256)

“…all laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void’ (Marbury v Madison, 5 US 1803 (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 170).

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” – Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights.”- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

If Any one who takes the oath of office does try to make a law or enforce a unconstitutional law they have violated their oath of office and can face losing their job and federal charges and imprisonment.

To disregard Constitutional law, and to violate the same, creates a sure liability upon the one involved:

“State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities.” Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991).

“Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of limitations upon his authority.” The United States Supreme Court, Federal Crop Ins. Corp, v. Merrill, 332 US 380-388 L1947)

All government officials and agencies, including all State legislatures, are bound by the Constitution and must NOT create any defacto laws which counter the Constitution:

The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”

To keep this a nation of law and not of men you have EVERY right you had BEFORE the state was ever created.

“The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business, or to open his doors to an investigation, so far as it may tend to criminate him. He owes no such duty to the state, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. United States Supreme Court reminds us in Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906):

Again they CAN NOT lawfully make any rule or laws concerning a right. They can not charge you for a right as in licenses, permits or fines or in any other manner. They CAN NOT imprison you or jail you for practicing a right.

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” – Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491.

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489.

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights.”- Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. What could you do before state and federal governments were created? You where only bound by common law, which was and is steal the supream law of the land.

“This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof;… shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby… The Senators and Representatives and members of the State legislature, and all executive and judicial officers of the United States and the several States, shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.” The Constitution of the united States of America, Article VI, Cl 2, 3.

Again what could you do and what did our forefathers do before state and federal governments were established? Well they could buy land and do anything they wanted on their land, they could build houses, no licenses or permits, no one telling them what they could build or how it had to be built, and no taxes and no one could take it away from you with out just compensation. They could grow gardens as well as herb and medicinal gardens, no regulations, no charges, no imprisonment. They could travel no license no tags no charges and no imprisonment, No one stopping them to search their belongings ( they would have been shot if they tried ), and no one asking them where you been and where are you going. They could own and shoot guns again no charges no imprisonment no rules no regulations. They could hunt, they could trap and they could fish, no charges no imprisonment. They could have meetings without being spied on or anyone telling them what they could or could not say or discuss. In fact as long as they did not hurt anyone or their property their power of what they could do or say was almost limitless.

Now think about all the unconstitutional laws they fine and or lock you up for today. Just for practicing your rights. Think about congress we have today that they themselves will admit most of what they do every day is unconstitutional. Our forefathers fought for a nation of law not of men. They were not a bunch of dummies. They formed a contract, The Constitution Of The United States Of America. A republic. Not a democracy. Not a Oligarchy. They formed the contract with the idea in mind that each man was created equal lawfully. And no man can be trusted to rule himself other than himself. Do not break the common law. Hurt no man or his property and you have committed no crime worthy of a fine in any way or imprisonment. You buy property and it is yours. You can do as you will with it just like you can if you buy a candy bar. You can eat it if you want or give it away, you can stomp it on the ground, grind it in and destroy it if you want. it is yours, you bought it do as you will as long as you hurt no one or their property. Your rights end where another ones rights begins. There must be fair trade in order for those rights of others to be respected. Therefore this must be a nation of laws and not of men. We must band together as a nation once again to hold our employee’s to their contract The Constitution Of The United States Of America. WE MUST BIND THEM TO THE LAW. To the contract. They have broken the law. They have allowed laws that are unconstitutional. They have fined, taxed, killed, stolen our property, and imprisoned unconstitutionally. They have twisted and unconstitutionally applied the law outside of their jurisdiction. You see you do not work for them they work for you. Band together and Hold Them Accountable. When some one they are replaced with breaks the law, Hold them accountable. In this way we are what our forefathers fought and died for. A nation of law and not of men, were everyone is created equal.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s